Re: conntrack & valgrind

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gilad Benjamini wrote:
Is conntrack supposed to be "valgrind clean" ?
I ran a few times "valgrind  --tool=memcheck --show-reachable=yes conntrack -L"
and I always get different "Invalid read of size " messages.

# valgrind --tool=memcheck --show-reachable=yes conntrack -L
==15883== Memcheck, a memory error detector.
==15883== [...]
==15883==
tcp      6 [...]
==15883==
==15883== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 19 from 1)
==15883== malloc/free: in use at exit: 18 bytes in 1 blocks.
==15883== malloc/free: 19 allocs, 18 frees, 3,966 bytes allocated.
==15883== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v
==15883== searching for pointers to 1 not-freed blocks.
==15883== checked 100,072 bytes.
==15883==
==15883== LEAK SUMMARY:
==15883==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==15883==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==15883==    still reachable: 18 bytes in 1 blocks.
==15883==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==15883== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory.

I can't reproduce the problem with current libraries and conntrack-tools SVN snapshots. Which version are you using?

--
Los honestos son inadaptados sociales -- Les Luthiers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux