Re: [PATCH 10/27] xt_conntrack match, revision 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 4 2008 15:53, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> Applied, but
>
>>  #include <linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tuple_common.h>
>> -#include <linux/in.h>
>> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
>> +#	include <linux/in.h>
>> +#endif
>
> Is that really necessary? I would prefer the only in-kernel user of this
> file to include it directly. Or simply include netfilter.h, which seems
> necessary for nf_inet_addr anyway.
>
With this #include, we grab the definition for 'struct in_addr'.

Yes it is necessary otherwise iptables fails to compile, because
struct in_addr is already sourced from netinet/in.h. If you have
a better idea, please share it.
Perhaps doing #include <linux/in.h> in xt_conntrack.c would resolve it.
I will see to that (if you do not already will take care of that) once I 
received your updated git tree.


thanks,
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux