Re: [PATCH 6/27] xt_CONNMARK target, revision 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jan 4 2008 15:45, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Ah ok. I was uncertain because xt_CONNMARK v0 or xt_MARK v0 did it
that way too. And since it's not exceeding 80 cols, it's kinda a
roll-a-die situation :)

Actually they don't. Maybe your editor did something funny :)


nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c-      switch (chunk_type) {
nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c:              case SCTP_CID_INIT:

I was right after all ^_^


Yeah, sctp is a mess.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux