Re: conntrack doesn't always work when a bridge is used

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Damien Thébault wrote:
Hello,

I sent the quoted mail to linux-net with my problem yesterday, but I
did a git bisect today and I got the following output :

2bf540b73ed5b304e84bb4d4c390d49d1cfa0ef8 is first bad commit
commit 2bf540b73ed5b304e84bb4d4c390d49d1cfa0ef8
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Dec 13 16:54:25 2006 -0800

    [NETFILTER]: bridge-netfilter: remove deferred hooks

    Remove the deferred hooks and all related code as scheduled in
    feature-removal-schedule.

    Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

:040000 040000 c49ea947455937566b6129991dde5e86f2453aae 6611736ce5c0fcde7627494b66b9ea94e37ea42e M      Documentation
:040000 040000 d0dd0700fe68f98b52687be3a0c31d73f7b15b81 f8ddf15a0389c5f5b7f2c11d7d0db039a660e1d5 M      include
:040000 040000 dafccf7ff8657be9adca6b28dbd365cdd6c01ca5 3eeb1cb4b16cc5cb698ab559b47ea6b0991d4d3a M      net

With exactly this version, the behaviour is similar with what I see
with 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc5 (see below).


Could you capture the conntrack events of the non-working
case with (run in parallel):

conntrack -E
conntrack -E expect
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux