Re: [PATCH 4/7] xt_mark match rev 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 17 2007 13:37, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Old revisions should be purged after a "reasonable time" (whatever
>> that means for everyone), or perhaps whenever there is a Linux kernel
>> version with a trailing .0 (2.7.0, 2.8.0), or when great new things
>> appear (pkttables, or whatever is in the works).
>> 
>> I think the step should better be made now than later, or this cruft
>> will be carried for the next 10 instead of 5 years.
>
>
> Mhh .. well, I guess I would apply patches that fix the types
> for all matches and targets and adds the old revisions to
> feature-removal-schedule with a timeframe of maybe two years.
> But this should happen for all of them at once, we don't
> want 20 different dates for removal.
>
>
I am working my way through... I just began with MARK because that
was most obvious.

Not all matches/targets are conversion-only. E.g. MARK where I done
both use-fixed-types and implement-XOR as a single revision/update,
which is, IMO, a good thing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux