Re: [PATCH 4/4] iptables: libxt_owner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 25 2007 16:22, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> +static void owner_mt_help(void)
>> +{
>> +	printf(
>> +"owner match v%s options:\n"
>> +"[!] --uid-owner userid     Match local UID\n"
>> +"[!] --gid-owner groupid    Match local GID\n"
>> +"[!] --socket-exists        Match if socket exists\n"
>> +"[!] --filp-exists          Match if filp exists\n"
>> +"\n",
>> +IPTABLES_VERSION);
>
> The filp-exists option strikes me as useless, what would the
> use case be? For the socket-exists option, I'd prefer for the
> owner match to simply accept no further option, i.e. "-m owner".
>


hasSocket hasFilp whatCouldItBe
===============================
       0       0  forwarded packet
       1       0  ping, nfs client, nfsd
       1       1  real connection

However, you mentioned that encapsulated (socket=1,filp=1) traffic
will show up without a "socket", but did you actually mean socket
or filp?

I just checked, and xfrm'ed traffic has the same properties as before 
the transformation.

So actually socket-exists is the useless one, as there is always a 
socket in any normal case.

What do you think?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux