Re: [PATCHv6 0/3] Interface group patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Patrick McHardy
> I'm working on the incremental ruleset changing API BTW :)
> One of the changes will be that interface matching is not
> a default part of every rule, and without wildcards it will
> use the ifindex. But since the cost of this feature seems
> pretty low, I don't see a compelling reason against it.

Using ifindex instead of string matching the interface name in -i and -o would 
be a serious problem as it changes the semantics.

1) Now you can match a non existing interface. This is certainly used. I.e. 
with vlan interfaces, ppp etc.
2) Now your rule will match an interface even if the ifindex of the interface 
changes. This is used (i.e. you activate a backup interface and rename it, 
build new bridges etc.).

If one wants to use the ifindex instead of a string match on the name one 
should explicitly request that (i.e. by using "-i =eth0" or something like 
that).

Regards,
-- 
Wolfgang Walter
Studentenwerk München
Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux