On Nov 19 2007 17:06, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > I just read up on your and Jan's discussion, but you were too fast > for me :) I'm not sure whether this is really a good candidate > for x_tables. IPv4 and IPv6 addrtype have different meanings, the > IPv4 addrtype is based on routing, IPv6 solely on the address. > Especially things like "--addrtype local" won't work, which is > IMO the most useful feature. And since you don't actually add IPv6 > support, I don't see any advantage in moving to x_tables. So I > think for now I'd prefer a change to the ipt_addrtype match. IMHO it does not make any difference whether it is xt_*.c or ipt_*.c, the cost is quite the same. I am all for xt_*.c, because that's the "new shiny" thing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
