Antoine Zen-Ruffinen a écrit :
What does it bring me to have a nanosecond precision if it is not
related to the actual arrival of frame time ? As it seem I can feel
skb->tstamp with whatever I want, I always become something else using
ioctl(). (I'm using kernel 2.6.23).
2007/11/12, Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:42:34 +0100
"Antoine Zen-Ruffinen" <antoine.zen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear all,
I'm writing a network analyzer software using Linux and I need a VERY
precise frame time stamping. Therefor I am planing to add my own time
stamping algorithm on a modified network driver. For test purpose I
did so :
skb->tstamp.tv64 = 0x00010002;
netif_rx(skb);
On the user side, I ask for the timestamp that way :
...
sock = socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, type);
...
//bind this socket with the interface using my modified driver.
...
recvByteCount = recv(sock, buffer, 1514, 0);
ioctl(sock, SIOCGSTAMP, &timeStamp);
I was surprised to see that the var timeStamp was still holding a
count of second since year 1970.
But then, maybe your problem comes from your code : timeStamp should be
declared as "struct timeval" of course, to get both tv_sec and tv_usec.
struct timeval tv;
ioctl(sock, SIOCSTAMP, &tv);
printf("packet arrived at %ld.%06ld\n", (long)tv.tv_sec, (long)tv.tv_usec);
If you *want* nanosecond resolution instead of microsecond, use :
struct timespec ts;
ioctl(sock, SIOCSTAMPNS, &ts);
printf("packet arrived at %ld.%09ld\n", (long)ts.tv_sec, (long)ts.tv_nsec);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
