Patrick McHardy wrote: > Al Boldi wrote: > > But can you see how forcing people into splitting > > their rules across tables adds complexity. And without ipt_REJECT > > patch, they can't even use REJECT in prerouting, which forces them to do > > some strange hacks. > > > > IMHO, we should make things as easily configurable as possible, and as > > things stand right now, the filter-table is completely useless for 99% > > of use-cases. > > Sure, as I said, patches to remove the arbitary restrictions to > tables are welcome, but please do this for all targets and > matches which allow this, not only REJECT. And if you include a > seperate (tested) patch for the IPv4 and IPv6 REJECT targets > I'll consider it as well. Sounds fair. All we need now is for someone to kindly submit these rather straight forward patches. Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
