Re: new target or new option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:36:15 +0200 (CEST), Jan Engelhardt wrote
> On Sep 28 2007 20:06, Kaloyan Kovachev wrote:
> >Hello,
> > i need to mark the connection with the realm number, but it seems there is no
> >'easy way' and there should be separate rule for each realm.
> >
> > Are there any plans to add this functionality and which is the preferable way
> >to go:
> >   1) create new REALMCONNMARK target with and/or mask
> 
> Yeah, since there is already an xt_realm, a xt_REALM would be
> the logical counterpart.

xt_REALM seams a logical name for changing the realm, not for marking the
packet or connection

> 
> >   2) extend the current CONNMARK by adding --realm-mark in addition to
--set-mark
> >
> > I think the second one will be easier and can be done in iptables extension
> >only without touching the kernel source right?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux