Re: [PATCH 05/13] Handle TCP SYN+ACK/ACK/RST transparency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
The TCP stack sends out SYN+ACK/ACK/RST reply packets in response to
incoming packets. The non-local source address check on output bites
us again, as replies for transparently redirected traffic won't have a
chance to leave the node.

This patch selectively sets the FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC flag when doing
the route lookup for those replies. Transparent replies are enabled if
the listening socket has the transparent socket flag set.

Signed-off-by: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

diff --git a/include/net/request_sock.h b/include/net/request_sock.h
index 7aed02c..b9c8974 100644
--- a/include/net/request_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/request_sock.h
@@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ struct request_sock_ops {
 				       struct request_sock *req,
 				       struct dst_entry *dst);
 	void		(*send_ack)(struct sk_buff *skb,
-				    struct request_sock *req);
+				    struct request_sock *req,
+				    int reply_flags);

How about putting the flags in the request_sock?

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index fbe7714..26b9dbe 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct dst_entry* inet_csk_route_req(struct sock *sk,
 					.saddr = ireq->loc_addr,
 					.tos = RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk) } },
 			    .proto = sk->sk_protocol,
+			    .flags = inet_sk(sk)->transparent ?
+					FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC : 0,

Introducing a function (sk_flowi_flags(sk) or something) might make
it a bit nicer to look at.

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index e089a97..7ae47e6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -625,7 +626,7 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
static void tcp_v4_send_ack(struct tcp_timewait_sock *twsk,
 			    struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack,
-			    u32 win, u32 ts)
+			    u32 win, u32 ts, int reply_flags)
 {
 	struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
 	struct {
@@ -701,36 +702,37 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_ack(struct tcp_timewait_sock *twsk,
 					arg.iov[0].iov_len);
 	}
 #endif
+	arg.flags = reply_flags;

Shouldn't this use twsk->transparent?
 	arg.csum = csum_tcpudp_nofold(ip_hdr(skb)->daddr,
 				      ip_hdr(skb)->saddr, /* XXX */
 				      arg.iov[0].iov_len, IPPROTO_TCP, 0);
 	arg.csumoffset = offsetof(struct tcphdr, check) / 2;
 	if (twsk)
 		arg.bound_dev_if = twsk->tw_sk.tw_bound_dev_if;
-
 	ip_send_reply(tcp_socket->sk, skb, &arg, arg.iov[0].iov_len);
Unrelated whitespace change

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux