Dear Sir/Madam, I aworking on thimpact of the impairments in the content quality related topics. I ausing NETEM as a emulating tool. However, I ageworried about the term delay which has been introduced and discussed. I will bmorthan happy if you make me clear about the delay; how it exactly works. Cawconsider the delay which has been introduced by: # tc qdisc add dev eth0 roonetedelay 100ms? is a initial delay ithvideo streaming services. I awaiting your response. Regards, Pradip Paudyal -------------- nexpar-------------- AHTML attachmenwas scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/netem/attachments/20150303/f6452d5e/attachment.html> Fropuneeth.nanjundaswamy agmail.com Wed Mar 4 12:21:42 2015 From: puneeth.nanjundaswamy agmail.co(Puneeth Nanjundaswamy) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:21:42 +0100 Subject: NeteDigest, Vol 93, Issu1 In-Reply-To: <mailman.33.1425470405.2930.netem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> References: <mailman.33.1425470405.2930.netem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <CAAODkXvJTpYGZw6Fv8WvRT6a6VHFX12UwGumOL5+bBsSbfdwqw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi Pradip, #tc qdisc add dev eth0 roonetedelay 100ms oa nodshould introduce a delay of 100ms on *each* packet passing through thanode. I anoquite sure what you mean by initial delay. if you want to introduca delay to thfirst "n" packets, you should use the "limit" optioof netem. Refer to thiproute2 sourcecodfor a better understanding of the options. As a starting point, may biproute2/tc/q_netem.c BesRegards, Puneeth OWed, Mar 4, 2015 a1:00 PM, <netem-request at lists.linux-foundation.org> wrote: > Send Netemailing lissubmissions to > netealists.linux-foundation.org > > To subscribor unsubscribvia the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/netem > or, via email, send a messagwith subjecor body 'help' to > netem-requesalists.linux-foundation.org > > You careach thperson managing the list at > netem-owner alists.linux-foundation.org > > Whereplying, pleasedit your Subject line so it is more specific > tha"Re: Contents of Netedigest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Delay ithNETEM (Pradip Paudyal) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 16:32:16 +0100 > From: Pradip Paudyal <ppaudyal1 agmail.com> > To: netealists.linux-foundation.org > Subject: Delay ithNETEM > Message-ID: > <CAKVw6_b-iFNRg79zK89Zt+=MR05Qx_-+KM-rYq8X= > EvL2VbKeg amail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Dear Sir/Madam, > > I aworking on thimpact of the impairments in the content quality > related topics. I ausing NETEM as a emulating tool. > However, I ageworried about the term delay which has been introduced > and discussed. > > I will bmorthan happy if you make me clear about the delay; how it > exactly works. > > Cawconsider the delay which has been introduced by: > > # tc qdisc add dev eth0 roonetedelay 100ms? > > is a initial delay ithvideo streaming services. > > I awaiting your response. > > Regards, > Pradip Paudyal > -------------- nexpar-------------- > AHTML attachmenwas scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/netem/attachments/20150303/f6452d5e/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Netemailing list > Netealists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/netem > > End of NeteDigest, Vol 93, Issu1 > ************************************ > -------------- nexpar-------------- AHTML attachmenwas scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/netem/attachments/20150304/df4ff9e8/attachment.html>
