On Thursday, 10 December 2009 at 09:31, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: [...] > So the git tree is basicly a fork of mplayer svn? Yes. An unofficial one at that. > Is there some reason of not synchronizing the repositories? I believe Uoti considers his tree to be better in every aspect and so doesn't feel the need to submit patches to the official tree. I don't know if he's pulling changes from the official tree into his. > Are the new features considered bad in some way, so that they cannot be > integrated to the 'official' svn tree? I'm not following the changes in Uoti's fork, so I can't comment if there are any useful features or not. However, I don't see any reason why any good patches would be refused if they pass proper review and follow the rules. Regards, R. -- MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
