On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 18:25 +0100, Reimar D?ffinger wrote: > From a purely "technical" standpoint I don't think a generic hoster will > provide the "main" repository though - if sourceforge is any indication > that would mean risking that your project is gone as soon as some clown > meets a lawyer (does repo.or.cz have a history in that regard?). I think this is much less of an issue with git. cvs and svn were clumsy enough that moving the repo was significant effort and caused major disruption. Moving a git repo is much easier, and the "main" repo being down has a much smaller effect on development. So IMO there's less need to worry about such issues in advance.
