Hi, On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Matyas Sustik <mplayer.list@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have encoded a 1080i broadcast using the following filters: > > pp=ci,crop=1904:1072:10:0,hqdn3d=4:3:6,softskip,scale=952:536:0:0:0.00:0.60,harddup > > with bitrate set to 3000. On a 20 seconds long sample the one pass encoding > produced a file with 8703945 bytes and quality: > x264 [info]: SSIM Mean Y:0.9805128 > x264 [info]: PSNR Mean Y:44.861 U:48.798 V:49.399 Avg:45.849 Global:45.537 > kb/s:3259.63 > > The two pass encoding (same filter and x264enc options) produced a file with > 9437678 bytes. > x264 [info]: SSIM Mean Y:0.9803121 > x264 [info]: PSNR Mean Y:44.632 U:48.669 V:49.280 Avg:45.642 Global:45.489 > kb/s:3068.16 > > So it would seem from this experiment that the one pass encoding produced a > smaller file with the same or better quality. (Visual inspection cannot tell > them apart.) Am I doing something wrong? This is not what one would expect, > right? Should I rerun this with other samples? The current one had a lot of > fast moving actions. I think you should try to work out this problem on x264's mailing list. Guillaume -- Only a very small fraction of our DNA does anything; the rest is all comments and ifdefs. Eddie Izzard - "I grew up in Europe, where the history comes from." _______________________________________________ MPlayer-users mailing list MPlayer-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users
