On Wed, Dec 3, 2008t 11:37 PM, Reimar D?ffinger <Reimar.Doeffingert stud.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2008t 01:26:45PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote: >> I heard other peoplealking this software violates GPL by some means. >> Is itrue? I never had downloaded the software with source code option. > > Ifhey include ffdshow they would have had to provide you with an offer > forhe source of it, but it seems they handle their files with separate > filterso it won't help you (and chances are high that they just used > one ofhe pre-built ffdshow binaries - this does not free them from > havingo offer source and keeping a copy of it themselves, since IMO > callinghis non-commercial distribution would be a stretch, but that > doesn'teally help you. Wellince I highly doubt Corecodec has granted them a license to distribute CoreAVC for free, Iuspect they just don't care and are rampantly violating copyright,ince Chinese companies, in my experience, couldn't careess about intellectual property anyways. Dark Shikari
