On Thursday, 06 November 2008 at 15:22, Nico Sabbi wrote:
[...]
> something is wrong with the current naming system: dvdread is only
> a library thus it should be renamed to libdvdread (and installed as
> such), as it was for a short period of time, until Dominik renamed it
> for the sake of backwards compatibility (maybe, I don't remember).
Yes, that was the exact reason.
> We should do something disruptive and call it lib<something>
> consistently
Well, consider this: when you link to a library, you use -lfoo and not
-llibfoo. I'm not against renaming the directory in which the headers
are installed, but in that case we should rename our libdvd* forks, too.
Maybe call them libdvd{read,nav}2 ?
Regards,
R.
PS. I think this discussion should be moved to dvdnav-discuss list.
--
MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
