Subject: [merged] exec-introduce-exec_binprm-for-depth-==-0-code.patch removed from -mm tree To: oleg@xxxxxxxxxx,keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx,viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx,zml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,mm-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:48:37 -0700 The patch titled Subject: exec: introduce exec_binprm() for "depth == 0" code has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was exec-introduce-exec_binprm-for-depth-==-0-code.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: exec: introduce exec_binprm() for "depth == 0" code task_pid_nr_ns() and trace/ptrace code in the middle of the recursive search_binary_handler() looks confusing and imho annoying. We only need this code if "depth == 0", lets add a simple helper which calls search_binary_handler() and does trace_sched_process_exec() + ptrace_event(). The patch also moves the setting of task->did_exec, we need to do this only once. Note: we can kill either task->did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Zach Levis <zml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/exec.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff -puN fs/exec.c~exec-introduce-exec_binprm-for-depth-==-0-code fs/exec.c --- a/fs/exec.c~exec-introduce-exec_binprm-for-depth-==-0-code +++ a/fs/exec.c @@ -1373,7 +1373,6 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b unsigned int depth = bprm->recursion_depth; int try,retval; struct linux_binfmt *fmt; - pid_t old_pid, old_vpid; /* This allows 4 levels of binfmt rewrites before failing hard. */ if (depth > 5) @@ -1387,12 +1386,6 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b if (retval) return retval; - /* Need to fetch pid before load_binary changes it */ - old_pid = current->pid; - rcu_read_lock(); - old_vpid = task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(current->parent)); - rcu_read_unlock(); - retval = -ENOENT; for (try=0; try<2; try++) { read_lock(&binfmt_lock); @@ -1407,16 +1400,11 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b retval = fn(bprm); bprm->recursion_depth = depth; if (retval >= 0) { - if (depth == 0) { - trace_sched_process_exec(current, old_pid, bprm); - ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, old_vpid); - } put_binfmt(fmt); allow_write_access(bprm->file); if (bprm->file) fput(bprm->file); bprm->file = NULL; - current->did_exec = 1; proc_exec_connector(current); return retval; } @@ -1450,9 +1438,29 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b } return retval; } - EXPORT_SYMBOL(search_binary_handler); +static int exec_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm) +{ + pid_t old_pid, old_vpid; + int ret; + + /* Need to fetch pid before load_binary changes it */ + old_pid = current->pid; + rcu_read_lock(); + old_vpid = task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(current->parent)); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + ret = search_binary_handler(bprm); + if (ret >= 0) { + trace_sched_process_exec(current, old_pid, bprm); + ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, old_vpid); + current->did_exec = 1; + } + + return ret; +} + /* * sys_execve() executes a new program. */ @@ -1541,7 +1549,7 @@ static int do_execve_common(const char * if (retval < 0) goto out; - retval = search_binary_handler(bprm); + retval = exec_binprm(bprm); if (retval < 0) goto out; _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from oleg@xxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch anon_inodefs-forbid-open-via-proc.patch autofs4-allow-autofs-to-work-outside-the-initial-pid-namespace.patch autofs4-translate-pids-to-the-right-namespace-for-the-daemon.patch signals-eventpoll-set-saved_sigmask-at-the-start.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html