Subject: [merged] exec-introduce-exec_binprm-for-depth-==-0-code.patch removed from -mm tree
To: oleg@xxxxxxxxxx,keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx,viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx,zml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,mm-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:48:37 -0700
The patch titled
Subject: exec: introduce exec_binprm() for "depth == 0" code
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
exec-introduce-exec_binprm-for-depth-==-0-code.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: exec: introduce exec_binprm() for "depth == 0" code
task_pid_nr_ns() and trace/ptrace code in the middle of the recursive
search_binary_handler() looks confusing and imho annoying. We only need
this code if "depth == 0", lets add a simple helper which calls
search_binary_handler() and does trace_sched_process_exec() +
ptrace_event().
The patch also moves the setting of task->did_exec, we need to do this
only once.
Note: we can kill either task->did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zach Levis <zml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/exec.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/exec.c~exec-introduce-exec_binprm-for-depth-==-0-code fs/exec.c
--- a/fs/exec.c~exec-introduce-exec_binprm-for-depth-==-0-code
+++ a/fs/exec.c
@@ -1373,7 +1373,6 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b
unsigned int depth = bprm->recursion_depth;
int try,retval;
struct linux_binfmt *fmt;
- pid_t old_pid, old_vpid;
/* This allows 4 levels of binfmt rewrites before failing hard. */
if (depth > 5)
@@ -1387,12 +1386,6 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b
if (retval)
return retval;
- /* Need to fetch pid before load_binary changes it */
- old_pid = current->pid;
- rcu_read_lock();
- old_vpid = task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(current->parent));
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
retval = -ENOENT;
for (try=0; try<2; try++) {
read_lock(&binfmt_lock);
@@ -1407,16 +1400,11 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b
retval = fn(bprm);
bprm->recursion_depth = depth;
if (retval >= 0) {
- if (depth == 0) {
- trace_sched_process_exec(current, old_pid, bprm);
- ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, old_vpid);
- }
put_binfmt(fmt);
allow_write_access(bprm->file);
if (bprm->file)
fput(bprm->file);
bprm->file = NULL;
- current->did_exec = 1;
proc_exec_connector(current);
return retval;
}
@@ -1450,9 +1438,29 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b
}
return retval;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL(search_binary_handler);
+static int exec_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
+{
+ pid_t old_pid, old_vpid;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Need to fetch pid before load_binary changes it */
+ old_pid = current->pid;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ old_vpid = task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(current->parent));
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ ret = search_binary_handler(bprm);
+ if (ret >= 0) {
+ trace_sched_process_exec(current, old_pid, bprm);
+ ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, old_vpid);
+ current->did_exec = 1;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
* sys_execve() executes a new program.
*/
@@ -1541,7 +1549,7 @@ static int do_execve_common(const char *
if (retval < 0)
goto out;
- retval = search_binary_handler(bprm);
+ retval = exec_binprm(bprm);
if (retval < 0)
goto out;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from oleg@xxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
anon_inodefs-forbid-open-via-proc.patch
autofs4-allow-autofs-to-work-outside-the-initial-pid-namespace.patch
autofs4-translate-pids-to-the-right-namespace-for-the-daemon.patch
signals-eventpoll-set-saved_sigmask-at-the-start.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
