Subject: [folded-merged] zbud-add-to-mm-init-under_reclaim.patch removed from -mm tree
To: sjenning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,bob.liu@xxxxxxxxxx,mm-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:02:28 -0700
The patch titled
Subject: zswap: init under_reclaim
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
zbud-add-to-mm-init-under_reclaim.patch
This patch was dropped because it was folded into zbud-add-to-mm.patch
------------------------------------------------------
From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: zswap: init under_reclaim
Bob Liu reported a memory leak in zswap. This was due to the
under_reclaim field in the zbud header not being initialized
to 0, which resulted in zbud_free() not freeing the page
under the false assumption that the page was undergoing
zbud reclaim.
This patch properly initializes the under_reclaim field.
Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/zbud.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -puN mm/zbud.c~zbud-add-to-mm-init-under_reclaim mm/zbud.c
--- a/mm/zbud.c~zbud-add-to-mm-init-under_reclaim
+++ a/mm/zbud.c
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static struct zbud_header *init_zbud_pag
zhdr->last_chunks = 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zhdr->buddy);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zhdr->lru);
+ zhdr->under_reclaim = 0;
return zhdr;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from sjenning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
zbud-add-to-mm.patch
zswap-add-to-mm.patch
zswap-add-to-mm-fix-kconfig-to-depend-on-crypto=y.patch
zswap-add-documentation.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
