+ memcg-dont-need-to-free-memcg-via-rcu-or-workqueue.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Subject: + memcg-dont-need-to-free-memcg-via-rcu-or-workqueue.patch added to -mm tree
To: lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx,glommer@xxxxxxxxxx,hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx,hughd@xxxxxxxxxx,kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,mhocko@xxxxxxx,tj@xxxxxxxxxx
From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:00:34 -0700


The patch titled
     Subject: memcg: don't need to free memcg via RCU or workqueue
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     memcg-dont-need-to-free-memcg-via-rcu-or-workqueue.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: memcg: don't need to free memcg via RCU or workqueue

Now memcg has the same life cycle with its corresponding cgroup, and a
cgroup is freed via RCU and then mem_cgroup_css_free() will be called in a
work function, so we can simply call __mem_cgroup_free() in
mem_cgroup_css_free().

This actually reverts 59927fb984d ("memcg: free mem_cgroup by RCU to fix
oops").

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |   51 ++++------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-dont-need-to-free-memcg-via-rcu-or-workqueue mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-dont-need-to-free-memcg-via-rcu-or-workqueue
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -263,28 +263,10 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
 	/* vmpressure notifications */
 	struct vmpressure vmpressure;
 
-	union {
-		/*
-		 * the counter to account for mem+swap usage.
-		 */
-		struct res_counter memsw;
-
-		/*
-		 * rcu_freeing is used only when freeing struct mem_cgroup,
-		 * so put it into a union to avoid wasting more memory.
-		 * It must be disjoint from the css field.  It could be
-		 * in a union with the res field, but res plays a much
-		 * larger part in mem_cgroup life than memsw, and might
-		 * be of interest, even at time of free, when debugging.
-		 * So share rcu_head with the less interesting memsw.
-		 */
-		struct rcu_head rcu_freeing;
-		/*
-		 * We also need some space for a worker in deferred freeing.
-		 * By the time we call it, rcu_freeing is no longer in use.
-		 */
-		struct work_struct work_freeing;
-	};
+	/*
+	 * the counter to account for mem+swap usage.
+	 */
+	struct res_counter memsw;
 
 	/*
 	 * the counter to account for kernel memory usage.
@@ -6202,29 +6184,6 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_free(struct mem
 		vfree(memcg);
 }
 
-
-/*
- * Helpers for freeing a kmalloc()ed/vzalloc()ed mem_cgroup by RCU,
- * but in process context.  The work_freeing structure is overlaid
- * on the rcu_freeing structure, which itself is overlaid on memsw.
- */
-static void free_work(struct work_struct *work)
-{
-	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
-
-	memcg = container_of(work, struct mem_cgroup, work_freeing);
-	__mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
-}
-
-static void free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
-{
-	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
-
-	memcg = container_of(rcu_head, struct mem_cgroup, rcu_freeing);
-	INIT_WORK(&memcg->work_freeing, free_work);
-	schedule_work(&memcg->work_freeing);
-}
-
 /*
  * Returns the parent mem_cgroup in memcgroup hierarchy with hierarchy enabled.
  */
@@ -6375,7 +6334,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct c
 
 	mem_cgroup_sockets_destroy(memcg);
 
-	call_rcu(&memcg->rcu_freeing, free_rcu);
+	__mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
linux-next.patch
memcg-update-todo-list-in-documentation.patch
revert-memcg-avoid-dangling-reference-count-in-creation-failure.patch
memcg-kmem-fix-reference-count-handling-on-the-error-path.patch
memcg-use-css_get-in-sock_update_memcg.patch
memcg-dont-use-mem_cgroup_get-when-creating-a-kmemcg-cache.patch
memcg-use-css_get-put-when-charging-uncharging-kmem.patch
memcg-use-css_get-put-when-charging-uncharging-kmem-fix.patch
memcg-use-css_get-put-for-swap-memcg.patch
memcg-dont-need-to-get-a-reference-to-the-parent.patch
memcg-kill-memcg-refcnt.patch
memcg-dont-need-to-free-memcg-via-rcu-or-workqueue.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux