The patch titled Subject: ARM: net: bpf_jit: make code generation less dependent on struct sk_filter. has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is arm-net-bpf_jit-make-code-generation-less-dependent-on-struct-sk_filter.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: ARM: net: bpf_jit: make code generation less dependent on struct sk_filter. This is in preparation of bpf_jit support for seccomp filters. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel.borkmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff -puN arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c~arm-net-bpf_jit-make-code-generation-less-dependent-on-struct-sk_filter arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c --- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c~arm-net-bpf_jit-make-code-generation-less-dependent-on-struct-sk_filter +++ a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ #define FLAG_NEED_X_RESET (1 << 0) struct jit_ctx { - const struct sk_filter *skf; + unsigned short prog_len; + struct sock_filter *prog_insns; unsigned idx; unsigned prologue_bytes; int ret0_fp_idx; @@ -131,8 +132,8 @@ static u16 saved_regs(struct jit_ctx *ct { u16 ret = 0; - if ((ctx->skf->len > 1) || - (ctx->skf->insns[0].code == BPF_S_RET_A)) + if ((ctx->prog_len > 1) || + (ctx->prog_insns[0].code == BPF_S_RET_A)) ret |= 1 << r_A; #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER @@ -181,7 +182,7 @@ static inline bool is_load_to_a(u16 inst static void build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx) { u16 reg_set = saved_regs(ctx); - u16 first_inst = ctx->skf->insns[0].code; + u16 first_inst = ctx->prog_insns[0].code; u16 off; #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER @@ -279,7 +280,7 @@ static u16 imm_offset(u32 k, struct jit_ ctx->imms[i] = k; /* constants go just after the epilogue */ - offset = ctx->offsets[ctx->skf->len]; + offset = ctx->offsets[ctx->prog_len]; offset += ctx->prologue_bytes; offset += ctx->epilogue_bytes; offset += i * 4; @@ -419,7 +420,7 @@ static inline void emit_err_ret(u8 cond, emit(ARM_MOV_R(ARM_R0, ARM_R0), ctx); } else { _emit(cond, ARM_MOV_I(ARM_R0, 0), ctx); - _emit(cond, ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->skf->len, ctx)), ctx); + _emit(cond, ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->prog_len, ctx)), ctx); } } @@ -469,14 +470,13 @@ static inline void update_on_xread(struc static int build_body(struct jit_ctx *ctx) { void *load_func[] = {jit_get_skb_b, jit_get_skb_h, jit_get_skb_w}; - const struct sk_filter *prog = ctx->skf; const struct sock_filter *inst; unsigned i, load_order, off, condt; int imm12; u32 k; - for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) { - inst = &(prog->insns[i]); + for (i = 0; i < ctx->prog_len; i++) { + inst = &(ctx->prog_insns[i]); /* K as an immediate value operand */ k = inst->k; @@ -769,8 +769,8 @@ cmp_x: ctx->ret0_fp_idx = i; emit_mov_i(ARM_R0, k, ctx); b_epilogue: - if (i != ctx->skf->len - 1) - emit(ARM_B(b_imm(prog->len, ctx)), ctx); + if (i != ctx->prog_len - 1) + emit(ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->prog_len, ctx)), ctx); break; case BPF_S_MISC_TAX: /* X = A */ @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ b_epilogue: } -void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) +static void __bpf_jit_compile(struct jit_ctx *out_ctx) { struct jit_ctx ctx; unsigned tmp_idx; @@ -867,11 +867,10 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *f if (!bpf_jit_enable) return; - memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx)); - ctx.skf = fp; + ctx = *out_ctx; ctx.ret0_fp_idx = -1; - ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.skf->len + 1), GFP_KERNEL); + ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.prog_len + 1), GFP_KERNEL); if (ctx.offsets == NULL) return; @@ -920,13 +919,26 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *f if (bpf_jit_enable > 1) /* there are 2 passes here */ bpf_jit_dump(fp->len, alloc_size, 2, ctx.target); - - fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target; out: kfree(ctx.offsets); + + *out_ctx = ctx; return; } +void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) +{ + struct jit_ctx ctx; + + memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx)); + ctx.prog_len = fp->len; + ctx.prog_insns = fp->insns; + + __bpf_jit_compile(&ctx); + if (ctx.target) + fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target; +} + static void bpf_jit_free_worker(struct work_struct *work) { module_free(NULL, work); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx are linux-next.patch seccomp-add-generic-code-for-jitted-seccomp-filters.patch arm-net-bpf_jit-make-code-generation-less-dependent-on-struct-sk_filter.patch arm-net-bpf_jit-add-support-for-jitted-seccomp-filters.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html