The patch titled
Subject: mm/hugetlb.c: make hugetlb_[un]register_node() static
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-hugetlbc-make-hugetlb_register_node-static.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Claudiu Ghioc <claudiughioc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/hugetlb.c: make hugetlb_[un]register_node() static
Fixes sparse warnings:
mm/hugetlb.c:1764:6: warning: symbol 'hugetlb_unregister_node' was not declared. Should it be static?
mm/hugetlb.c:1808:6: warning: symbol 'hugetlb_register_node' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Ghioc <claudiu.ghioc@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlbc-make-hugetlb_register_node-static mm/hugetlb.c
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlbc-make-hugetlb_register_node-static
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1761,7 +1761,7 @@ static struct hstate *kobj_to_node_hstat
* Unregister hstate attributes from a single node device.
* No-op if no hstate attributes attached.
*/
-void hugetlb_unregister_node(struct node *node)
+static void hugetlb_unregister_node(struct node *node)
{
struct hstate *h;
struct node_hstate *nhs = &node_hstates[node->dev.id];
@@ -1805,7 +1805,7 @@ static void hugetlb_unregister_all_nodes
* Register hstate attributes for a single node device.
* No-op if attributes already registered.
*/
-void hugetlb_register_node(struct node *node)
+static void hugetlb_register_node(struct node *node)
{
struct hstate *h;
struct node_hstate *nhs = &node_hstates[node->dev.id];
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from claudiughioc@xxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
