The patch titled Subject: mm/hugetlb.c: make hugetlb_[un]register_node() static has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was mm-hugetlbc-make-hugetlb_register_node-static.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Claudiu Ghioc <claudiughioc@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: mm/hugetlb.c: make hugetlb_[un]register_node() static Fixes sparse warnings: mm/hugetlb.c:1764:6: warning: symbol 'hugetlb_unregister_node' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/hugetlb.c:1808:6: warning: symbol 'hugetlb_register_node' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Claudiu Ghioc <claudiu.ghioc@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -puN mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlbc-make-hugetlb_register_node-static mm/hugetlb.c --- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlbc-make-hugetlb_register_node-static +++ a/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -1761,7 +1761,7 @@ static struct hstate *kobj_to_node_hstat * Unregister hstate attributes from a single node device. * No-op if no hstate attributes attached. */ -void hugetlb_unregister_node(struct node *node) +static void hugetlb_unregister_node(struct node *node) { struct hstate *h; struct node_hstate *nhs = &node_hstates[node->dev.id]; @@ -1805,7 +1805,7 @@ static void hugetlb_unregister_all_nodes * Register hstate attributes for a single node device. * No-op if attributes already registered. */ -void hugetlb_register_node(struct node *node) +static void hugetlb_register_node(struct node *node) { struct hstate *h; struct node_hstate *nhs = &node_hstates[node->dev.id]; _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from claudiughioc@xxxxxxxxx are linux-next.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html