The patch titled
Subject: kernel/utsname_sysctl.c: put get/get_uts() into CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL code block
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
sysctl-put-get-get_uts-into-config_proc_sysctl-code-block.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: kernel/utsname_sysctl.c: put get/get_uts() into CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL code block
Put get/get_uts() into CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL code block as they are used
only when CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/utsname_sysctl.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN kernel/utsname_sysctl.c~sysctl-put-get-get_uts-into-config_proc_sysctl-code-block kernel/utsname_sysctl.c
--- a/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c~sysctl-put-get-get_uts-into-config_proc_sysctl-code-block
+++ a/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
#include <linux/sysctl.h>
#include <linux/wait.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
+
static void *get_uts(ctl_table *table, int write)
{
char *which = table->data;
@@ -38,7 +40,6 @@ static void put_uts(ctl_table *table, in
up_write(&uts_sem);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
/*
* Special case of dostring for the UTS structure. This has locks
* to observe. Should this be in kernel/sys.c ????
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from yuanhan.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
