The patch titled
Subject: x86 numa: don't check if node is NUMA_NO_NODE
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
x86-numa-dont-check-if-node-is-numa_no_node.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: x86 numa: don't check if node is NUMA_NO_NODE
If we aren't debugging per_cpu maps, the cpu's node is stored in per_cpu
variable numa_node. If `node' is NUMA_NO_NODE, it means the caller wants
to clear the cpu's node. So we should also call set_cpu_numa_node() in
this case.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/mm/numa.c~x86-numa-dont-check-if-node-is-numa_no_node arch/x86/mm/numa.c
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c~x86-numa-dont-check-if-node-is-numa_no_node
+++ a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -97,8 +97,7 @@ void numa_set_node(int cpu, int node)
#endif
per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_node_map, cpu) = node;
- if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
- set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, node);
+ set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, node);
}
void numa_clear_node(int cpu)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
x86-make-mem=-option-to-work-for-efi-platform.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
