The patch titled Subject: x86 numa: don't check if node is NUMA_NO_NODE has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was x86-numa-dont-check-if-node-is-numa_no_node.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: x86 numa: don't check if node is NUMA_NO_NODE If we aren't debugging per_cpu maps, the cpu's node is stored in per_cpu variable numa_node. If `node' is NUMA_NO_NODE, it means the caller wants to clear the cpu's node. So we should also call set_cpu_numa_node() in this case. Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -puN arch/x86/mm/numa.c~x86-numa-dont-check-if-node-is-numa_no_node arch/x86/mm/numa.c --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c~x86-numa-dont-check-if-node-is-numa_no_node +++ a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -97,8 +97,7 @@ void numa_set_node(int cpu, int node) #endif per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_node_map, cpu) = node; - if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE) - set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, node); + set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, node); } void numa_clear_node(int cpu) _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch x86-make-mem=-option-to-work-for-efi-platform.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html