The patch titled Subject: rtc: max77686: use dev_info() instead of printk() has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was rtc-max77686-use-dev_info-instead-of-printk.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: rtc: max77686: use dev_info() instead of printk() Fix the checkpatch warning as below: WARNING: Prefer netdev_err(netdev, ... then dev_err(dev, ... then pr_err(... to printk(KERN_ERR ... Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -puN drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c~rtc-max77686-use-dev_info-instead-of-printk drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c~rtc-max77686-use-dev_info-instead-of-printk +++ a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct pla struct max77686_rtc_info *info; int ret, virq; - printk(KERN_INFO "%s\n", __func__); + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__); info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct max77686_rtc_info), GFP_KERNEL); if (!info) @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct pla &max77686_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE); if (IS_ERR(info->rtc_dev)) { - printk(KERN_INFO "%s: fail\n", __func__); + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s: fail\n", __func__); ret = PTR_ERR(info->rtc_dev); dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register RTC device: %d\n", ret); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch linux-next.patch rtc-rtc-palmas-use-devm_request_threaded_irq.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html