The patch titled
Subject: make GFP_NOTRACK definition unconditional
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
make-gfp_notrack-definition-unconditional.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: make GFP_NOTRACK definition unconditional
There was a general sentiment in a recent discussion (See
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/258) that the __GFP flags should be
defined unconditionally. Currently, the only offender is GFP_NOTRACK,
which is conditional to KMEMCHECK.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/gfp.h | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/gfp.h~make-gfp_notrack-definition-unconditional include/linux/gfp.h
--- a/include/linux/gfp.h~make-gfp_notrack-definition-unconditional
+++ a/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -30,11 +30,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
#define ___GFP_HARDWALL 0x20000u
#define ___GFP_THISNODE 0x40000u
#define ___GFP_RECLAIMABLE 0x80000u
-#ifdef CONFIG_KMEMCHECK
#define ___GFP_NOTRACK 0x200000u
-#else
-#define ___GFP_NOTRACK 0
-#endif
#define ___GFP_OTHER_NODE 0x800000u
#define ___GFP_WRITE 0x1000000u
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
