+ mempolicy-fix-refcount-leak-in-mpol_set_shared_policy.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy()
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mempolicy-fix-refcount-leak-in-mpol_set_shared_policy.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy()

When shared_policy_replace() fails to allocate new->policy is not freed
correctly by mpol_set_shared_policy().  The problem is that shared
mempolicy code directly call kmem_cache_free() in multiple places where it
is easy to make a mistake.

This patch creates an sp_free wrapper function and uses it. The bug was
introduced pre-git age (IOW, before 2.6.12-rc2).

[mgorman@xxxxxxx: Editted changelog]
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/mempolicy.c |   15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/mempolicy.c~mempolicy-fix-refcount-leak-in-mpol_set_shared_policy mm/mempolicy.c
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mempolicy-fix-refcount-leak-in-mpol_set_shared_policy
+++ a/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2157,12 +2157,17 @@ mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_
 	return pol;
 }
 
+static void sp_free(struct sp_node *n)
+{
+	mpol_put(n->policy);
+	kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+}
+
 static void sp_delete(struct shared_policy *sp, struct sp_node *n)
 {
 	pr_debug("deleting %lx-l%lx\n", n->start, n->end);
 	rb_erase(&n->nd, &sp->root);
-	mpol_put(n->policy);
-	kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+	sp_free(n);
 }
 
 static struct sp_node *sp_alloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
@@ -2301,7 +2306,7 @@ int mpol_set_shared_policy(struct shared
 	}
 	err = shared_policy_replace(info, vma->vm_pgoff, vma->vm_pgoff+sz, new);
 	if (err && new)
-		kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, new);
+		sp_free(new);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -2318,9 +2323,7 @@ void mpol_free_shared_policy(struct shar
 	while (next) {
 		n = rb_entry(next, struct sp_node, nd);
 		next = rb_next(&n->nd);
-		rb_erase(&n->nd, &p->root);
-		mpol_put(n->policy);
-		kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+		sp_delete(p, n);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

revert-mm-mempolicy-let-vma_merge-and-vma_split-handle-vma-vm_policy-linkages.patch
mempolicy-remove-mempolicy-sharing.patch
mempolicy-fix-a-race-in-shared_policy_replace.patch
mempolicy-fix-refcount-leak-in-mpol_set_shared_policy.patch
mempolicy-fix-a-memory-corruption-by-refcount-imbalance-in-alloc_pages_vma.patch
mempolicy-fix-a-memory-corruption-by-refcount-imbalance-in-alloc_pages_vma-v2.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux