+ rtc-snvs-add-freescale-rtc-snvs-driver-fix.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: rtc: snvs: change timeout to use a fixed number of loop
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     rtc-snvs-add-freescale-rtc-snvs-driver-fix.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: rtc: snvs: change timeout to use a fixed number of loop

Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The timeout code here is fragile.  If acquiring the spinlock takes more
> than a millisecond or if this thread gets interrupted or preempted then
> we could easily execute that loop just a single time, and fail.
>
> It would be better to retry a fixed number of times, say 1000?  That
> would take around 1 millisecond, but might be overkill.

Take Andrew's suggestion to change the timeout code to retry 1000
times.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c~rtc-snvs-add-freescale-rtc-snvs-driver-fix drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c~rtc-snvs-add-freescale-rtc-snvs-driver-fix
+++ a/drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c
@@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ static void rtc_write_sync_lp(void __iom
 
 static int snvs_rtc_enable(struct snvs_rtc_data *data, bool enable)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(1);
 	unsigned long flags;
+	int timeout = 1000;
 	u32 lpcr;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static int snvs_rtc_enable(struct snvs_r
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
 
-	while (1) {
+	while (--timeout) {
 		lpcr = readl(data->ioaddr + SNVS_LPCR);
 
 		if (enable) {
@@ -108,11 +108,11 @@ static int snvs_rtc_enable(struct snvs_r
 			if (!(lpcr & SNVS_LPCR_SRTC_ENV))
 				break;
 		}
-
-		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
-			return -ETIMEDOUT;
 	}
 
+	if (!timeout)
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx are

linux-next.patch
rtc-snvs-add-freescale-rtc-snvs-driver.patch
rtc-snvs-add-freescale-rtc-snvs-driver-fix.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux