The patch titled Subject: memcg: mem_cgroup_move_parent() doesn't need gfp_mask has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was memcg-mem_cgroup_move_parent-doesnt-need-gfp_mask.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: memcg: mem_cgroup_move_parent() doesn't need gfp_mask Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/memcontrol.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-mem_cgroup_move_parent-doesnt-need-gfp_mask mm/memcontrol.c --- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-mem_cgroup_move_parent-doesnt-need-gfp_mask +++ a/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -2643,8 +2643,7 @@ out: static int mem_cgroup_move_parent(struct page *page, struct page_cgroup *pc, - struct mem_cgroup *child, - gfp_t gfp_mask) + struct mem_cgroup *child) { struct mem_cgroup *parent; unsigned int nr_pages; @@ -3652,7 +3651,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(s pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page); - ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg, GFP_KERNEL); + ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg); if (ret == -EBUSY || ret == -EINVAL) { /* found lock contention or "pc" is obsolete. */ _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html