[nacked] memcg-oom-clarify-some-oom-dump-messages.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: memcg, oom: clarify some oom dump messages
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     memcg-oom-clarify-some-oom-dump-messages.patch

This patch was dropped because it was nacked

------------------------------------------------------
From: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: memcg, oom: clarify some oom dump messages

Revise some oom dump messages to avoid misleading admin.

[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: checkpatch fixes]
Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |    2 +-
 mm/oom_kill.c   |    5 +++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-oom-clarify-some-oom-dump-messages mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-oom-clarify-some-oom-dump-messages
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct me
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	printk(KERN_INFO "Task in %s killed", memcg_name);
+	pr_info("Task in %s will be killed", memcg_name);
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	ret = cgroup_path(mem_cgrp, memcg_name, PATH_MAX);
diff -puN mm/oom_kill.c~memcg-oom-clarify-some-oom-dump-messages mm/oom_kill.c
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c~memcg-oom-clarify-some-oom-dump-messages
+++ a/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct
 		dump_header(p, gfp_mask, order, memcg, nodemask);
 
 	task_lock(p);
-	pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %d or sacrifice child\n",
+	pr_err("%s: Will kill process %d (%s) score %d or sacrifice child\n",
 		message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points);
 	task_unlock(p);
 
@@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct
 	if (!p) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		put_task_struct(victim);
+		pr_err("No process has been killed!\n");
 		return;
 	} else if (victim != p) {
 		get_task_struct(p);
@@ -540,7 +541,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct
 				continue;
 
 			task_lock(p);	/* Protect ->comm from prctl() */
-			pr_err("Kill process %d (%s) sharing same memory\n",
+			pr_err("Killed process %d (%s) sharing same memory\n",
 				task_pid_nr(p), p->comm);
 			task_unlock(p);
 			do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from handai.szj@xxxxxxxxxx are

mm-oom-introduce-helper-function-to-process-threads-during-scan.patch
mm-memcg-introduce-own-oom-handler-to-iterate-only-over-its-own-threads.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux