[merged] ufs-fix-incorrect-return-value-about-success-and-failed.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: drivers/scsi/ufs: fix incorrect return value about SUCCESS and FAILED
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     ufs-fix-incorrect-return-value-about-success-and-failed.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: drivers/scsi/ufs: fix incorrect return value about SUCCESS and FAILED

Currently the UFS host driver has returned incorrect values for SUCCESS
and FAILED.  Fix it to return the correct value to the upper layer.

Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Santosh Y <santoshsy@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c~ufs-fix-incorrect-return-value-about-success-and-failed drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c~ufs-fix-incorrect-return-value-about-success-and-failed
+++ a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1163,6 +1163,8 @@ static int ufshcd_task_req_compl(struct 
 		if (task_result != UPIU_TASK_MANAGEMENT_FUNC_COMPL &&
 		    task_result != UPIU_TASK_MANAGEMENT_FUNC_SUCCEEDED)
 			task_result = FAILED;
+		else
+			task_result = SUCCESS;
 	} else {
 		task_result = FAILED;
 		dev_err(&hba->pdev->dev,
@@ -1556,7 +1558,7 @@ ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 		goto out;
 	}
 	clear_bit(free_slot, &hba->tm_condition);
-	return ufshcd_task_req_compl(hba, free_slot);
+	err = ufshcd_task_req_compl(hba, free_slot);
 out:
 	return err;
 }
@@ -1580,7 +1582,7 @@ static int ufshcd_device_reset(struct sc
 	tag = cmd->request->tag;
 
 	err = ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(hba, &hba->lrb[tag], UFS_LOGICAL_RESET);
-	if (err)
+	if (err == FAILED)
 		goto out;
 
 	for (pos = 0; pos < hba->nutrs; pos++) {
@@ -1620,7 +1622,7 @@ static int ufshcd_host_reset(struct scsi
 	if (hba->ufshcd_state == UFSHCD_STATE_RESET)
 		return SUCCESS;
 
-	return (ufshcd_do_reset(hba) == SUCCESS) ? SUCCESS : FAILED;
+	return ufshcd_do_reset(hba);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1652,7 +1654,7 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
 
 	err = ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(hba, &hba->lrb[tag], UFS_ABORT_TASK);
-	if (err)
+	if (err == FAILED)
 		goto out;
 
 	scsi_dma_unmap(cmd);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx are

linux-next.patch
hfsplus-use-enomem-when-kzalloc-fails.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux