[merged] fat-mark-superblock-as-dirty-less-often.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: fat: mark superblock as dirty less often
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     fat-mark-superblock-as-dirty-less-often.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: fat: mark superblock as dirty less often

Preparation for further changes.  It touches few functions in fatent.c and
prevents them from marking the superblock as dirty unnecessarily often. 
Namely, instead of marking it as dirty in the internal tight loops - do it
only once at the end of the functions.  And instead of marking it as dirty
while holding the FAT table lock, do it outside the lock.

The reason for this patch is that marking the superblock as dirty will
soon become a little bit heavier operation, so it is cleaner to do this
only when it is necessary.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/fat/fatent.c |    9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/fat/fatent.c~fat-mark-superblock-as-dirty-less-often fs/fat/fatent.c
--- a/fs/fat/fatent.c~fat-mark-superblock-as-dirty-less-often
+++ a/fs/fat/fatent.c
@@ -503,7 +503,6 @@ int fat_alloc_clusters(struct inode *ino
 				sbi->prev_free = entry;
 				if (sbi->free_clusters != -1)
 					sbi->free_clusters--;
-				mark_fsinfo_dirty(sb);
 
 				cluster[idx_clus] = entry;
 				idx_clus++;
@@ -525,11 +524,11 @@ int fat_alloc_clusters(struct inode *ino
 	/* Couldn't allocate the free entries */
 	sbi->free_clusters = 0;
 	sbi->free_clus_valid = 1;
-	mark_fsinfo_dirty(sb);
 	err = -ENOSPC;
 
 out:
 	unlock_fat(sbi);
+	mark_fsinfo_dirty(sb);
 	fatent_brelse(&fatent);
 	if (!err) {
 		if (inode_needs_sync(inode))
@@ -554,7 +553,7 @@ int fat_free_clusters(struct inode *inod
 	struct fat_entry fatent;
 	struct buffer_head *bhs[MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE];
 	int i, err, nr_bhs;
-	int first_cl = cluster;
+	int first_cl = cluster, dirty_fsinfo = 0;
 
 	nr_bhs = 0;
 	fatent_init(&fatent);
@@ -592,7 +591,7 @@ int fat_free_clusters(struct inode *inod
 		ops->ent_put(&fatent, FAT_ENT_FREE);
 		if (sbi->free_clusters != -1) {
 			sbi->free_clusters++;
-			mark_fsinfo_dirty(sb);
+			dirty_fsinfo = 1;
 		}
 
 		if (nr_bhs + fatent.nr_bhs > MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE) {
@@ -622,6 +621,8 @@ error:
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_bhs; i++)
 		brelse(bhs[i]);
 	unlock_fat(sbi);
+	if (dirty_fsinfo)
+		mark_fsinfo_dirty(sb);
 
 	return err;
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
linux-next.patch
fat-switch-to-fsinfo_inode.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux