The patch titled
Subject: microblaze: don't reimplement force_sigsegv()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
microblaze-dont-reimplement-force_sigsegv.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: microblaze: don't reimplement force_sigsegv()
Instead of open coding the sequence from force_sigsegv() just call it.
This also fixes a bug because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler (which
is a copy of sighand->action[]), whereas the intention of the code was to
modify sighand->action[] directly.
As the original code was working with a copy it had no effect on signal
delivery.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c~microblaze-dont-reimplement-force_sigsegv arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c~microblaze-dont-reimplement-force_sigsegv
+++ a/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c
@@ -270,9 +270,7 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, stru
return;
give_sigsegv:
- if (sig == SIGSEGV)
- ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
- force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+ force_sigsegv(sig, current);
}
/* Handle restarting system calls */
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
