+ revert-mm-vmscan-fix-misused-nr_reclaimed-in-shrink_mem_cgroup_zone.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: Revert "mm: vmscan: fix misused nr_reclaimed in shrink_mem_cgroup_zone()"
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     revert-mm-vmscan-fix-misused-nr_reclaimed-in-shrink_mem_cgroup_zone.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Revert "mm: vmscan: fix misused nr_reclaimed in shrink_mem_cgroup_zone()"

This reverts commit c38446cc65e1f2b3eb8630c53943b94c4f65f670.

Before the commit, the code makes senses to me but not after the commit. 
The "nr_reclaimed" is the number of pages reclaimed by scanning through
the memcg's lru lists.  The "nr_to_reclaim" is the target value for the
whole function.  For example, we like to early break the reclaim if
reclaimed 32 pages under direct reclaim (not DEF_PRIORITY).

After the reverted commit, the target "nr_to_reclaim" is decremented each
time by "nr_reclaimed" but we still use it to compare the "nr_reclaimed". 
It just doesn't make sense to me...

Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/vmscan.c |    7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~revert-mm-vmscan-fix-misused-nr_reclaimed-in-shrink_mem_cgroup_zone mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~revert-mm-vmscan-fix-misused-nr_reclaimed-in-shrink_mem_cgroup_zone
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2107,12 +2107,7 @@ restart:
 		 * with multiple processes reclaiming pages, the total
 		 * freeing target can get unreasonably large.
 		 */
-		if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim)
-			nr_to_reclaim = 0;
-		else
-			nr_to_reclaim -= nr_reclaimed;
-
-		if (!nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
+		if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
 			break;
 	}
 	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
_
Subject: Subject: Revert "mm: vmscan: fix misused nr_reclaimed in shrink_mem_cgroup_zone()"

Patches currently in -mm which might be from yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx are

memcg-fix-up-documentation-on-global-lru.patch
revert-mm-vmscan-fix-misused-nr_reclaimed-in-shrink_mem_cgroup_zone.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux