[merged] sysrq-use-send_sig_forced-instead-of-force_sig.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: sysrq: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     sysrq-use-send_sig_forced-instead-of-force_sig.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: sysrq: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig()

Change send_sig_all() to use do_send_sig_info(SEND_SIG_FORCED)
instead of force_sig(SIGKILL). With the recent changes we do not
need force_ to kill the CLONE_NEWPID tasks.

And this is more correct. force_sig() can race with the exiting
thread, while do_send_sig_info(group => true) kill the whole
process.

Some more notes from Oleg Nesterov:

> Just one note. This change makes no difference for sysrq_handle_kill().
> But it obviously changes the behaviour sysrq_handle_term(). I think
> this is fine, if you want to really kill the task which blocks/ignores
> SIGTERM you can use sysrq_handle_kill().
>
> Even ignoring the reasons why force_sig() is simply wrong here,
> force_sig(SIGTERM) looks strange. The task won't be killed if it has
> a handler, but SIG_IGN can't help. However if it has the handler
> but blocks SIGTERM temporary (this is very common) it will be killed.

Also,

> force_sig() can't kill the process if the main thread has already
> exited. IOW, it is trivial to create the process which can't be
> killed by sysrq.

So, this patch fixes the issue.

Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/tty/sysrq.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN drivers/tty/sysrq.c~sysrq-use-send_sig_forced-instead-of-force_sig drivers/tty/sysrq.c
--- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c~sysrq-use-send_sig_forced-instead-of-force_sig
+++ a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static void send_sig_all(int sig)
 		if (is_global_init(p))
 			continue;
 
-		force_sig(sig, p);
+		do_send_sig_info(sig, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
 	}
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux