[merged] signal-cosmetic-s-from_ancestor_ns-force-in-prepare_signal-paths.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: signal: cosmetic, s/from_ancestor_ns/force/ in prepare_signal() paths
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     signal-cosmetic-s-from_ancestor_ns-force-in-prepare_signal-paths.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: signal: cosmetic, s/from_ancestor_ns/force/ in prepare_signal() paths

Cosmetic, rename the from_ancestor_ns argument in prepare_signal() paths. 
After the previous change it doesn't match the reality.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/signal.c |   15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/signal.c~signal-cosmetic-s-from_ancestor_ns-force-in-prepare_signal-paths kernel/signal.c
--- a/kernel/signal.c~signal-cosmetic-s-from_ancestor_ns-force-in-prepare_signal-paths
+++ a/kernel/signal.c
@@ -58,21 +58,20 @@ static int sig_handler_ignored(void __us
 		(handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
 }
 
-static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig,
-		int from_ancestor_ns)
+static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
 {
 	void __user *handler;
 
 	handler = sig_handler(t, sig);
 
 	if (unlikely(t->signal->flags & SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE) &&
-			handler == SIG_DFL && !from_ancestor_ns)
+			handler == SIG_DFL && !force)
 		return 1;
 
 	return sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig);
 }
 
-static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, int from_ancestor_ns)
+static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Blocked signals are never ignored, since the
@@ -82,7 +81,7 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struc
 	if (sigismember(&t->blocked, sig) || sigismember(&t->real_blocked, sig))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!sig_task_ignored(t, sig, from_ancestor_ns))
+	if (!sig_task_ignored(t, sig, force))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -855,7 +854,7 @@ static void ptrace_trap_notify(struct ta
  * Returns true if the signal should be actually delivered, otherwise
  * it should be dropped.
  */
-static int prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, int from_ancestor_ns)
+static int prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, bool force)
 {
 	struct signal_struct *signal = p->signal;
 	struct task_struct *t;
@@ -915,7 +914,7 @@ static int prepare_signal(int sig, struc
 		}
 	}
 
-	return !sig_ignored(p, sig, from_ancestor_ns);
+	return !sig_ignored(p, sig, force);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1602,7 +1601,7 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, st
 
 	ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
 	result = TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED;
-	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, 0))
+	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, false))
 		goto out;
 
 	ret = 0;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from oleg@xxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
linux-next.patch
avr32-dont-mask-signals-in-the-error-path.patch
avr32-use-set_current_blocked-in-handle_signal-sys_rt_sigreturn.patch
avr32-use-block_sigmask.patch
ia64-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
microblaze-dont-reimplement-force_sigsegv.patch
microblaze-no-need-to-reset-handler-if-sa_oneshot.patch
microblaze-fix-signal-masking.patch
microblaze-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
mips-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
score-dont-mask-signals-if-we-fail-to-setup-signal-stack.patch
score-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
unicore32-use-block_sigmask.patch
blackfin-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
parisc-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
mm-coredump-fail-allocations-when-coredumping-instead-of-oom-killing.patch
frv-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
sh-no-need-to-reset-handler-if-sa_oneshot.patch
sh-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
h8300-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
alpha-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
m32r-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
m68k-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
mn10300-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
c6x-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
cris-use-set_current_blocked-and-block_sigmask.patch
powerpc-eeh-remove-eeh_event_handler-daemonize.patch
pidns-add-reboot_pid_ns-to-handle-the-reboot-syscall.patch
pidns-add-reboot_pid_ns-to-handle-the-reboot-syscall-fix.patch
sysctl-make-kernelns_last_pid-control-being-checkpoint_restore-dependent.patch
fs-proc-introduce-proc-pid-task-tid-children-entry-v9.patch
c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file.patch
c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-get-clear_tid_address.patch
c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-get-clear_tid_address-fix.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux