The patch titled
Subject: consolidate WARN_...ONCE() static variables
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
consolidate-warn_once-static-variables.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: consolidate WARN_...ONCE() static variables
Due to the alignment of following variables, these typically consume more
than just the single byte that 'bool' requires, and as there are a few
hundred instances, the cache pollution (not so much the waste of memory)
sums up. Put these variables into their own section, outside of any half
way frequently used memory range.
Do the same also to the __warned variable of rcu_lockdep_assert().
(Don't, however, include the ones used by printk_once() and alike, as they
can potentially be hot.)
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/asm-generic/bug.h | 6 +++---
include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 1 +
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/asm-generic/bug.h~consolidate-warn_once-static-variables include/asm-generic/bug.h
--- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h~consolidate-warn_once-static-variables
+++ a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const cha
#endif
#define WARN_ON_ONCE(condition) ({ \
- static bool __warned; \
+ static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
\
if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const cha
})
#define WARN_ONCE(condition, format...) ({ \
- static bool __warned; \
+ static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
\
if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const cha
})
#define WARN_TAINT_ONCE(condition, taint, format...) ({ \
- static bool __warned; \
+ static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
\
if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
diff -puN include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h~consolidate-warn_once-static-variables include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
--- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h~consolidate-warn_once-static-variables
+++ a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
@@ -167,6 +167,7 @@
CPU_KEEP(exit.data) \
MEM_KEEP(init.data) \
MEM_KEEP(exit.data) \
+ *(.data.unlikely) \
STRUCT_ALIGN(); \
*(__tracepoints) \
/* implement dynamic printk debug */ \
diff -puN include/linux/rcupdate.h~consolidate-warn_once-static-variables include/linux/rcupdate.h
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h~consolidate-warn_once-static-variables
+++ a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ extern int rcu_my_thread_group_empty(voi
*/
#define rcu_lockdep_assert(c, s) \
do { \
- static bool __warned; \
+ static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !__warned && !(c)) { \
__warned = true; \
lockdep_rcu_suspicious(__FILE__, __LINE__, s); \
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from JBeulich@xxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
