The patch titled
Subject: coccinelle: semantic patch for simple_open()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
coccinelle-semantic-patch-for-simple_open.patch
This patch was dropped because it was nacked
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: coccinelle: semantic patch for simple_open()
Find instances of an open-coded simple_open() and replace them with calls
to simple_open().
This seems to eat the definition of simple_open() as well. Is there a way
to say only remove both the function and the reference to the function so
that libfs survives?
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
scripts/coccinelle/api/simple_open.cocci | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff -puN /dev/null scripts/coccinelle/api/simple_open.cocci
--- /dev/null
+++ a/scripts/coccinelle/api/simple_open.cocci
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// This removes an open coded simple_open() function
+// and replaces file operations references to the function
+// with simple_open() instead.
+//
+
+virtual patch
+virtual context
+
+@ open @
+identifier open_f;
+identifier i, f;
+@@
+-int open_f(struct inode *i, struct file *f)
+-{
+(
+-if (i->i_private)
+-f->private_data = i->i_private;
+|
+-f->private_data = i->i_private;
+)
+-return 0;
+-}
+
+@ has_open depends on open @
+identifier fops;
+identifier open.open_f;
+@@
+struct file_operations fops = {
+...
+-.open = open_f,
++.open = simple_open,
+...
+};
+
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
libfs-add-simple_open.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
