The patch titled
Subject: lib/cpumask.c: remove __any_online_cpu()
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
lib-cpumaskc-remove-__any_online_cpu.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: lib/cpumask.c: remove __any_online_cpu()
__any_online_cpu() is not optimal and also unnecessary. So, replace its
use by faster cpumask_* operations.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 3 +--
lib/cpumask.c | 12 ------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/cpumask.h~lib-cpumaskc-remove-__any_online_cpu include/linux/cpumask.h
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h~lib-cpumaskc-remove-__any_online_cpu
+++ a/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -809,11 +809,10 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *get_
#else /* NR_CPUS > 1 */
int __first_cpu(const cpumask_t *srcp);
int __next_cpu(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp);
-int __any_online_cpu(const cpumask_t *mask);
#define first_cpu(src) __first_cpu(&(src))
#define next_cpu(n, src) __next_cpu((n), &(src))
-#define any_online_cpu(mask) __any_online_cpu(&(mask))
+#define any_online_cpu(mask) cpumask_any_and(&mask, cpu_online_mask)
#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) \
for ((cpu) = -1; \
(cpu) = next_cpu((cpu), (mask)), \
diff -puN lib/cpumask.c~lib-cpumaskc-remove-__any_online_cpu lib/cpumask.c
--- a/lib/cpumask.c~lib-cpumaskc-remove-__any_online_cpu
+++ a/lib/cpumask.c
@@ -26,18 +26,6 @@ int __next_cpu_nr(int n, const cpumask_t
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__next_cpu_nr);
#endif
-int __any_online_cpu(const cpumask_t *mask)
-{
- int cpu;
-
- for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
- if (cpu_online(cpu))
- break;
- }
- return cpu;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__any_online_cpu);
-
/**
* cpumask_next_and - get the next cpu in *src1p & *src2p
* @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (ie. return will be > @n)
_
Subject: Subject: lib/cpumask.c: remove __any_online_cpu()
Patches currently in -mm which might be from srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
smp-introduce-a-generic-on_each_cpu_mask-function.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9.patch
lib-cpumaskc-remove-__any_online_cpu.patch
arch-ia64-remove-references-to-cpu__map.patch
cpumask-avoid-mask-based-num_possible_cpus-and-num_online_cpus.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
