The patch titled
Subject: xtensa: fix memscan()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
xtensa-fix-memscan.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: xtensa: fix memscan()
Defining memscan() as memchr() is wrong, because the return values of
memscan() and memchr() are different when the character is not found. So
use the generic memscan() implementation to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/xtensa/include/asm/string.h | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/xtensa/include/asm/string.h~xtensa-fix-memscan arch/xtensa/include/asm/string.h
--- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/string.h~xtensa-fix-memscan
+++ a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/string.h
@@ -118,7 +118,4 @@ extern void *memmove(void *__dest, __con
/* Don't build bcopy at all ... */
#define __HAVE_ARCH_BCOPY
-#define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMSCAN
-#define memscan memchr
-
#endif /* _XTENSA_STRING_H */
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
ocfs2-use-find_last_bit.patch
ocfs2-use-bitmap_weight.patch
drivers-scsi-hpsac-use-find_first_zero_bit.patch
bitops-rename-for_each_set_bit_cont-in-favor-of-analogous-listh-function.patch
bitops-remove-for_each_set_bit_cont.patch
bitops-introduce-for_each_clear_bit.patch
mtd-use-for_each_clear_bit.patch
s390-char-use-for_each_clear_bit.patch
uwb-use-for_each_clear_bit.patch
x86-use-for_each_clear_bit_from.patch
string-memchr_inv-speed-improvements.patch
sysctl-use-bitmap-library-functions.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
