The patch titled Subject: block: document blk-plug has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was block-document-blk-plug.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ ------------------------------------------------------ From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxx> Subject: block: document blk-plug Thus spake Andrew Morton: "And I have the usual maintainability whine. If someone comes up to vmscan.c and sees it calling blk_start_plug(), how are they supposed to work out why that call is there? They go look at the blk_start_plug() definition and it is undocumented. I think we can do better than this?" Adapted from the LWN article - http://lwn.net/Articles/438256/ by Jens Axboe and from an earlier attempt by Shaohua Li to document blk-plug. [akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: grammatical and spelling tweaks] Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxx> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxx> --- block/blk-core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ include/linux/blkdev.h | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff -puN block/blk-core.c~block-document-blk-plug block/blk-core.c --- a/block/blk-core.c~block-document-blk-plug +++ a/block/blk-core.c @@ -2629,6 +2629,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kblockd_schedule_delayed_w #define PLUG_MAGIC 0x91827364 +/** + * blk_start_plug - initialize blk_plug and track it inside the task_struct + * @plug: The &struct blk_plug that needs to be initialized + * + * Description: + * Tracking blk_plug inside the task_struct will help with auto-flushing the + * pending I/O should the task end up blocking between blk_start_plug() and + * blk_finish_plug(). This is important from a performance perspective, but + * also ensures that we don't deadlock. For instance, if the task is blocking + * for a memory allocation, memory reclaim could end up wanting to free a + * page belonging to that request that is currently residing in our private + * plug. By flushing the pending I/O when the process goes to sleep, we avoid + * this kind of deadlock. + */ void blk_start_plug(struct blk_plug *plug) { struct task_struct *tsk = current; diff -puN include/linux/blkdev.h~block-document-blk-plug include/linux/blkdev.h --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h~block-document-blk-plug +++ a/include/linux/blkdev.h @@ -863,16 +863,22 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue_no extern void blk_put_queue(struct request_queue *); /* - * Note: Code in between changing the blk_plug list/cb_list or element of such - * lists is preemptable, but such code can't do sleep (or be very careful), - * otherwise data is corrupted. For details, please check schedule() where - * blk_schedule_flush_plug() is called. + * blk_plug permits building a queue of related requests by holding the I/O + * fragments for a short period. This allows merging of sequential requests + * into single larger request. As the requests are moved from a per-task list to + * the device's request_queue in a batch, this results in improved scalability + * as the lock contention for request_queue lock is reduced. + * + * It is ok not to disable preemption when adding the request to the plug list + * or when attempting a merge, because blk_schedule_flush_list() will only flush + * the plug list when the task sleeps by itself. For details, please see + * schedule() where blk_schedule_flush_plug() is called. */ struct blk_plug { - unsigned long magic; - struct list_head list; - struct list_head cb_list; - unsigned int should_sort; + unsigned long magic; /* detect uninitialized use-cases */ + struct list_head list; /* requests */ + struct list_head cb_list; /* md requires an unplug callback */ + unsigned int should_sort; /*list to be sorted before flushing? */ }; #define BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT 16 _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from sjayaraman@xxxxxxx are linux-next.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html