+ calibrate-extract-fall-back-calculation-into-own-helper.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     calibrate: extract fall-back calculation into own helper
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     calibrate-extract-fall-back-calculation-into-own-helper.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: calibrate: extract fall-back calculation into own helper
From: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@xxxxxxxxx>

The motivation for this patch series is that currently our OMAP calibrates
itself using the trial-and-error binary chop fallback that some other
architectures no longer need to perform.  This is a lengthy process,
taking 0.2s in an environment where boot time is of great interest.

Patch 2/4 has two optimisations.  Firstly, it replaces the initial
repeated- doubling to find the relevant power of 2 with a tight loop that
just does as much as it can in a jiffy.  Secondly, it doesn't binary chop
over an entire power of 2 range, it choses a much smaller range based on
how much it squeezed in, and failed to squeeze in, during the first stage.
 Both are significant optimisations, and bring our calibration down from
23 jiffies to 5, and, in the process, often arrive at a more accurate lpj
value.

The 'bands' and 'sub-logarithmic' growth may look over-engineered, but
they only cost a small level of inaccuracy in the initial guess (for all
architectures) in order to avoid the very large inaccuracies that appeared
during testing (on x86_64 architectures, and presumably others with less
metronomic operation).  Note that due to the existence of the TSC and
other timers, the x86_64 will not typically use this fallback routine, but
I wanted to code defensively, able to cope with all kinds of processor
behaviours and kernel command line options.

Patch 3/4 is an additional trap for the nightmare scenario where the
initial estimate is very inaccurate, possibly due to things like SMIs.
It simply retries with a larger bound.


This patch:

... so that it can be modified more clinically.

This is almost entirely cosmetic. The only change to the operation
is that the global variable is only set once after the estimation is
completed, rather than taking on all the intermediate values. However,
there are no readers of that variable, so this change is unimportant.

Signed-off-by: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 init/calibrate.c |   73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff -puN init/calibrate.c~calibrate-extract-fall-back-calculation-into-own-helper init/calibrate.c
--- a/init/calibrate.c~calibrate-extract-fall-back-calculation-into-own-helper
+++ a/init/calibrate.c
@@ -119,10 +119,47 @@ static unsigned long __cpuinit calibrate
  */
 #define LPS_PREC 8
 
-void __cpuinit calibrate_delay(void)
+static unsigned long __cpuinit calibrate_delay_converge(void)
 {
-	unsigned long ticks, loopbit;
+	unsigned long lpj, ticks, loopbit;
 	int lps_precision = LPS_PREC;
+
+	lpj = (1<<12);
+	while ((lpj <<= 1) != 0) {
+		/* wait for "start of" clock tick */
+		ticks = jiffies;
+		while (ticks == jiffies)
+			/* nothing */;
+		/* Go .. */
+		ticks = jiffies;
+		__delay(lpj);
+		ticks = jiffies - ticks;
+		if (ticks)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Do a binary approximation to get lpj set to
+	 * equal one clock (up to lps_precision bits)
+	 */
+	lpj >>= 1;
+	loopbit = lpj;
+	while (lps_precision-- && (loopbit >>= 1)) {
+		lpj |= loopbit;
+		ticks = jiffies;
+		while (ticks == jiffies)
+			/* nothing */;
+		ticks = jiffies;
+		__delay(lpj);
+		if (jiffies != ticks)	/* longer than 1 tick */
+			lpj &= ~loopbit;
+	}
+
+	return lpj;
+}
+
+void __cpuinit calibrate_delay(void)
+{
 	static bool printed;
 
 	if (preset_lpj) {
@@ -139,39 +176,9 @@ void __cpuinit calibrate_delay(void)
 			pr_info("Calibrating delay using timer "
 				"specific routine.. ");
 	} else {
-		loops_per_jiffy = (1<<12);
-
 		if (!printed)
 			pr_info("Calibrating delay loop... ");
-		while ((loops_per_jiffy <<= 1) != 0) {
-			/* wait for "start of" clock tick */
-			ticks = jiffies;
-			while (ticks == jiffies)
-				/* nothing */;
-			/* Go .. */
-			ticks = jiffies;
-			__delay(loops_per_jiffy);
-			ticks = jiffies - ticks;
-			if (ticks)
-				break;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * Do a binary approximation to get loops_per_jiffy set to
-		 * equal one clock (up to lps_precision bits)
-		 */
-		loops_per_jiffy >>= 1;
-		loopbit = loops_per_jiffy;
-		while (lps_precision-- && (loopbit >>= 1)) {
-			loops_per_jiffy |= loopbit;
-			ticks = jiffies;
-			while (ticks == jiffies)
-				/* nothing */;
-			ticks = jiffies;
-			__delay(loops_per_jiffy);
-			if (jiffies != ticks)	/* longer than 1 tick */
-				loops_per_jiffy &= ~loopbit;
-		}
+		loops_per_jiffy = calibrate_delay_converge();
 	}
 	if (!printed)
 		pr_cont("%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS (lpj=%lu)\n",
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from ext-phil.2.carmody@xxxxxxxxx are

linux-next.patch
calibrate-extract-fall-back-calculation-into-own-helper.patch
calibrate-home-in-on-correct-lpj-value-more-quickly.patch
calibrate-retry-with-wider-bounds-when-converge-seems-to-fail.patch
calibrate-retry-with-wider-bounds-when-converge-seems-to-fail-fix.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux