+ fs-fs_posix_acl-does-not-depend-on-block.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     fs: FS_POSIX_ACL does not depend on BLOCK
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     fs-fs_posix_acl-does-not-depend-on-block.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: fs: FS_POSIX_ACL does not depend on BLOCK
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>

- Fix a kconfig unmet dependency warning.
- Remove the comment that identifies which filesystems use POSIX ACL
  utility routines.
- Move the FS_POSIX_ACL symbol outside of the BLOCK symbol if/endif block
  because its functions do not depend on BLOCK and some of the filesystems
  that use it do not depend on BLOCK.

warning: (GENERIC_ACL && JFFS2_FS_POSIX_ACL && NFSD_V4 && NFS_ACL_SUPPORT && 9P_FS_POSIX_ACL) selects FS_POSIX_ACL which has unmet direct dependencies (BLOCK)

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/Kconfig |   17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/Kconfig~fs-fs_posix_acl-does-not-depend-on-block fs/Kconfig
--- a/fs/Kconfig~fs-fs_posix_acl-does-not-depend-on-block
+++ a/fs/Kconfig
@@ -30,15 +30,6 @@ config FS_MBCACHE
 source "fs/reiserfs/Kconfig"
 source "fs/jfs/Kconfig"
 
-config FS_POSIX_ACL
-# Posix ACL utility routines (for now, only ext2/ext3/jfs/reiserfs/nfs4)
-#
-# NOTE: you can implement Posix ACLs without these helpers (XFS does).
-# 	Never use this symbol for ifdefs.
-#
-	bool
-	default n
-
 source "fs/xfs/Kconfig"
 source "fs/gfs2/Kconfig"
 source "fs/ocfs2/Kconfig"
@@ -47,6 +38,14 @@ source "fs/nilfs2/Kconfig"
 
 endif # BLOCK
 
+# Posix ACL utility routines
+#
+# Note: Posix ACLs can be implemented without these helpers.  Never use
+# this symbol for ifdefs in core code.
+#
+config FS_POSIX_ACL
+	def_bool n
+
 config EXPORTFS
 	tristate
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx are

linux-next.patch
backlight-fix-88pm860x_bl-macro-collision.patch
leds-route-kbd-leds-through-the-generic-leds-layer.patch
uml-mmapper_kern-needs-module_license.patch
name_to_dev_t-must-not-call-__init-code.patch
kernel-clean-up-use_generic_smp_helpers.patch
kptr_restrict-fix-build-when-printk-not-enabled.patch
fs-fs_posix_acl-does-not-depend-on-block.patch
gpio_rdc321x-select-mfd_support-to-squelch-kconfig-warning.patch
gpio_vx855-eliminate-kconfig-dependency-warning.patch
memstick-factor-out-transfer-initiating-functionality-in-mspro_blockc-fix.patch
w1-ds2423-counter-driver-and-documentation-fix.patch
mutex-subsystem-synchro-test-module-add-missing-header-file.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux