[merged] latencytop-fix-per-task-accumulator.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     latencytop: fix per task accumulator
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     latencytop-fix-per-task-accumulator.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: latencytop: fix per task accumulator
From: Ken Chen <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx>

Per task latencytop accumulator prematurely terminates due to erroneous
placement of latency_record_count.  It should be incremented whenever a
new record is allocated instead of increment on every latencytop event.

Also fix search iterator to only search known record events instead of
blindly searching all pre-allocated space.

Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/latencytop.c |   17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/latencytop.c~latencytop-fix-per-task-accumulator kernel/latencytop.c
--- a/kernel/latencytop.c~latencytop-fix-per-task-accumulator
+++ a/kernel/latencytop.c
@@ -194,14 +194,7 @@ __account_scheduler_latency(struct task_
 
 	account_global_scheduler_latency(tsk, &lat);
 
-	/*
-	 * short term hack; if we're > 32 we stop; future we recycle:
-	 */
-	tsk->latency_record_count++;
-	if (tsk->latency_record_count >= LT_SAVECOUNT)
-		goto out_unlock;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < LT_SAVECOUNT; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < tsk->latency_record_count; i++) {
 		struct latency_record *mylat;
 		int same = 1;
 
@@ -227,8 +220,14 @@ __account_scheduler_latency(struct task_
 		}
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * short term hack; if we're > 32 we stop; future we recycle:
+	 */
+	if (tsk->latency_record_count >= LT_SAVECOUNT)
+		goto out_unlock;
+
 	/* Allocated a new one: */
-	i = tsk->latency_record_count;
+	i = tsk->latency_record_count++;
 	memcpy(&tsk->latency_record[i], &lat, sizeof(struct latency_record));
 
 out_unlock:
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx are


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux