The patch titled
lib/list_sort: test: use more reasonable printk levels
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
lib-list_sort-test-use-more-reasonable-printk-levels.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: lib/list_sort: test: use more reasonable printk levels
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
I do not see any reason to use KERN_WARN for normal messages and
KERN_EMERG for error messages in the lib_sort testing routine. Let's use
more reasonable KERN_NORM and KERN_ERR levels.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Don Mullis <don.mullis@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/list_sort.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff -puN lib/list_sort.c~lib-list_sort-test-use-more-reasonable-printk-levels lib/list_sort.c
--- a/lib/list_sort.c~lib-list_sort-test-use-more-reasonable-printk-levels
+++ a/lib/list_sort.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
struct list_head *head = kmalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL);
struct list_head *cur;
- printk(KERN_WARNING "testing list_sort()\n");
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "testing list_sort()\n");
cur = head;
for (i = 0; i < LIST_SORT_TEST_LENGTH; i++) {
@@ -189,17 +189,17 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
struct debug_el *el = container_of(cur, struct debug_el, l_h);
int cmp_result = cmp(NULL, cur, cur->next);
if (cur->next->prev != cur) {
- printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() returned "
- "a corrupted list!\n");
+ printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() returned "
+ "a corrupted list!\n");
return 1;
} else if (cmp_result > 0) {
- printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() failed to sort!\n");
+ printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() failed to sort!\n");
return 1;
} else if (cmp_result == 0 &&
el->serial >= container_of(cur->next,
struct debug_el, l_h)->serial) {
- printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() failed to preserve order"
- " of equivalent elements!\n");
+ printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() failed to preserve order "
+ "of equivalent elements!\n");
return 1;
}
kfree(cur->prev);
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
}
kfree(cur);
if (count != LIST_SORT_TEST_LENGTH) {
- printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() returned list of"
- "different length!\n");
+ printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() returned list of "
+ "different length!\n");
return 1;
}
return 0;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
jffs2-use-cond_resched-instead-of-yield.patch
lib-list_sort-do-not-pass-bad-pointers-to-cmp-callback.patch
lib-kconfigdebug-add-list_sort-debugging-switch.patch
lib-list_sort-test-use-more-reasonable-printk-levels.patch
lib-list_sort-test-use-generic-random32.patch
lib-list_sort-test-improve-errors-handling.patch
lib-list_sort-test-unify-test-messages.patch
lib-list_sort-test-check-element-addresses.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
