The patch titled
vmscan: check all_unreclaimable in direct reclaim path
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
vmscan-check-all_unreclaimable-in-direct-reclaim-path.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: vmscan: check all_unreclaimable in direct reclaim path
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
M. Vefa Bicakci reported 2.6.35 kernel hang up when hibernation on his
32bit 3GB mem machine.
(https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771). Also he bisected
the regression to
commit bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
Author: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Jun 4 14:15:05 2010 -0700
vmscan: fix do_try_to_free_pages() return value when priority==0 reclaim failure
At first impression, this seemed very strange because the above commit
only chenged function return value and hibernate_preallocate_memory()
ignore return value of shrink_all_memory(). But it's related.
Now, page allocation from hibernation code may enter infinite loop if the
system has highmem. The reasons are that vmscan don't care enough OOM
case when oom_killer_disabled.
The problem sequence is following as.
1. hibernation
2. oom_disable
3. alloc_pages
4. do_try_to_free_pages
if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && !all_unreclaimable)
return 1;
If kswapd is not freozen, it would set zone->all_unreclaimable to 1 and
then shrink_zones maybe return true(ie, all_unreclaimable is true). So at
last, alloc_pages could go to _nopage_. If it is, it should have no
problem.
This patch adds all_unreclaimable check to protect in direct reclaim path,
too. It can care of hibernation OOM case and help bailout
all_unreclaimable case slightly.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~vmscan-check-all_unreclaimable-in-direct-reclaim-path mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~vmscan-check-all_unreclaimable-in-direct-reclaim-path
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1804,12 +1804,11 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, st
* If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
* scan then give up on it.
*/
-static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
+static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
struct scan_control *sc)
{
struct zoneref *z;
struct zone *zone;
- bool all_unreclaimable = true;
for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
@@ -1827,8 +1826,36 @@ static bool shrink_zones(int priority, s
}
shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
- all_unreclaimable = false;
}
+}
+
+static inline bool zone_reclaimable(struct zone *zone)
+{
+ return zone->pages_scanned < zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6;
+}
+
+static inline bool all_unreclaimable(struct zonelist *zonelist,
+ struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ struct zoneref *z;
+ struct zone *zone;
+ bool all_unreclaimable = true;
+
+ if (!scanning_global_lru(sc))
+ return false;
+
+ for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
+ gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
+ if (!populated_zone(zone))
+ continue;
+ if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
+ continue;
+ if (zone_reclaimable(zone)) {
+ all_unreclaimable = false;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
return all_unreclaimable;
}
@@ -1852,7 +1879,6 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_page
struct scan_control *sc)
{
int priority;
- bool all_unreclaimable;
unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
struct zoneref *z;
@@ -1869,7 +1895,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_page
sc->nr_scanned = 0;
if (!priority)
disable_swap_token();
- all_unreclaimable = shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
+ shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
/*
* Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
* over limit cgroups
@@ -1931,7 +1957,7 @@ out:
return sc->nr_reclaimed;
/* top priority shrink_zones still had more to do? don't OOM, then */
- if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && !all_unreclaimable)
+ if (!all_unreclaimable(zonelist, sc))
return 1;
return 0;
@@ -2197,8 +2223,7 @@ loop_again:
total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned;
if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
continue;
- if (nr_slab == 0 &&
- zone->pages_scanned >= (zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6))
+ if (nr_slab == 0 && !zone_reclaimable(zone))
zone->all_unreclaimable = 1;
/*
* If we've done a decent amount of scanning and
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx are
mm-compaction-handle-active-and-inactive-fairly-in-too_many_isolated.patch
vmscan-check-all_unreclaimable-in-direct-reclaim-path.patch
vmstat-update-zone-stat-threshold-when-onlining-a-cpu.patch
mm-page-allocator-update-free-page-counters-after-pages-are-placed-on-the-free-list.patch
mm-page-allocator-update-free-page-counters-after-pages-are-placed-on-the-free-list-fix.patch
mm-page-allocator-drain-per-cpu-lists-after-direct-reclaim-allocation-fails.patch
mm-vmap-area-cache.patch
mm-compaction-fix-compactpagefailed-counting.patch
vmscan-prevent-background-aging-of-anon-page-in-no-swap-system.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
