The patch titled
kernel/sys.c: fix missing rcu protection for sys_getpriority()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
kernel-sysc-fix-missing-rcu-protection-for-sys_getpriority.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: kernel/sys.c: fix missing rcu protection for sys_getpriority()
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
find_task_by_vpid() is not safe without rcu_read_lock(). 2.6.33-rc7 got
RCU protection for sys_setpriority() but missed it for sys_getpriority().
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sys.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff -puN kernel/sys.c~kernel-sysc-fix-missing-rcu-protection-for-sys_getpriority kernel/sys.c
--- a/kernel/sys.c~kernel-sysc-fix-missing-rcu-protection-for-sys_getpriority
+++ a/kernel/sys.c
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(getpriority, int, which,
if (which > PRIO_USER || which < PRIO_PROCESS)
return -EINVAL;
+ rcu_read_lock();
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
switch (which) {
case PRIO_PROCESS:
@@ -267,6 +268,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(getpriority, int, which,
}
out_unlock:
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return retval;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
kernel-pidc-update-comment-on-find_task_by_pid_ns.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
