The patch titled
acpi: fix section mismatch
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
acpi-fix-section-mismatch.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: acpi: fix section mismatch
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() uses processor_idle_dmi_table(), which is
marked __cpuinitdata. It's only called by acpi_bus_init, which is __init.
We mark it __cpuinit.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c~acpi-fix-section-mismatch drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c~acpi-fix-section-mismatch
+++ a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 l
return AE_OK;
}
-void acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
+void __cpuinit acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
{
/*
* Check whether the system is DMI table. If yes, OSPM
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from jeffm@xxxxxxxx are
acpi-fix-section-mismatch.patch
hugetlb-fix-section-mismatches-2.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
