+ mm-order-evictable-rescue-in-lru-putback.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     vmscan: order evictable rescue in LRU putback
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-order-evictable-rescue-in-lru-putback.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: vmscan: order evictable rescue in LRU putback
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Isolators putting a page back to the LRU do not hold the page lock, and if
the page is mlocked, another thread might munlock it concurrently.

Expecting this, the putback code re-checks the evictability of a page when
it just moved it to the unevictable list in order to correct its decision.

The problem, however, is that ordering is not garuanteed between setting
PG_lru when moving the page to the list and checking PG_mlocked
afterwards:

	#0:				#1

	spin_lock()
					if (TestClearPageMlocked())
					  if (PageLRU())
					    move to evictable list
	SetPageLRU()
	spin_unlock()
	if (!PageMlocked())
	  move to evictable list

The PageMlocked() check may get reordered before SetPageLRU() in #0,
resulting in #0 not moving the still mlocked page, and in #1 failing to
isolate and move the page as well.  The page is now stranded on the
unevictable list.

The race condition is very unlikely.  The consequence currently is one
page falling off the reclaim grid and eventually getting freed with
PG_unevictable set, which triggers a warning in the page allocator.

TestClearPageMlocked() in #1 already provides full memory barrier
semantics.

This patch adds an explicit full barrier to force ordering between
SetPageLRU() and PageMlocked() so that either one of the competitors
rescues the page.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@xxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---


diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~mm-order-evictable-rescue-in-lru-putback mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-order-evictable-rescue-in-lru-putback
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -544,6 +544,16 @@ redo:
 		 */
 		lru = LRU_UNEVICTABLE;
 		add_page_to_unevictable_list(page);
+		/*
+		 * When racing with an mlock clearing (page is
+		 * unlocked), make sure that if the other thread does
+		 * not observe our setting of PG_lru and fails
+		 * isolation, we see PG_mlocked cleared below and move
+		 * the page back to the evictable list.
+		 *
+		 * The other side is TestClearPageMlocked().
+		 */
+		smp_mb();
 	}
 
 	/*
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
mm-order-evictable-rescue-in-lru-putback.patch
mm-warn-once-when-a-page-is-freed-with-pg_mlocked-set.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux